Discussion:
Bridges
(too old to reply)
Patrick Whittle
2007-12-28 18:26:55 UTC
Permalink
Can anyone answer this?
Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
Kevin Longley
2007-12-28 23:13:32 UTC
Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_bridge
Post by Patrick Whittle
Can anyone answer this?
Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
Roger Abell [MVP]
2007-12-29 04:50:10 UTC
Permalink
Yes, traditionally the term bridge was used for protocol
transitioning devices, and we see much less of these now.
But for example, IP does not work for deep space, so how
would you transition telemetry onto local storage network?
Post by Patrick Whittle
Can anyone answer this?
Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
Patrick Whittle
2007-12-30 15:09:27 UTC
Permalink
Good point. Ever since the DEW system became legacy, NASA must be using
something else.
Post by Roger Abell [MVP]
Yes, traditionally the term bridge was used for protocol
transitioning devices, and we see much less of these now.
But for example, IP does not work for deep space, so how
would you transition telemetry onto local storage network?
Post by Patrick Whittle
Can anyone answer this?
Everything is TCP/IP today, so why do you need a bridge?
Aren't bridges used for communication from one protocol to another (i.e.
TCP/IP to Novell IPX for exmpl) ?
Mark Arnold [MVP]
2007-12-29 16:18:50 UTC
Permalink
Bridges are like so totally last year. You can like tunnel everything
now and it looks so much better from an aesthetic point of view. Like.
Loading...